Agreement intelligence for private credit
Every covenant figure, traced to the words that authorise it.
ClauseTrace reads an executed credit agreement and returns a structured covenant specification. No field exists in it without a citation verified against the source document.
Quotes verified against source
Quotes dropped as unverifiable
Cited fields across two agreements
Agreements analysed · from public filings
Luxfer Holdings PLC
200 cited fieldsSEC EDGAR & Companies House
Your own infrastructure
Proposing layerThe problem
The figure you must test is rarely defined where the covenant sits.
One leverage covenant in a real 2021 facilities agreement. Three hops before the arithmetic appears, and every hop is a place a manual read can stop too early. Keep scrolling to walk it.
Method
Ask for the words. Derive everything else.
The model returns the contract's exact language and nothing more. Page, clause and character span are computed afterwards by matching that quote back into the source.
What is the leverage covenant and when is it tested?
Which definitions freeze GAAP, and as at what date?
Is cash netting capped?
What must be delivered, to whom, and by when?
Which add backs are capped, and at what percentage?
What happens on a breach, and is there an equity cure?
Product
Three layers, because the failure modes differ.
A language model reads prose well and does arithmetic badly. Code is the reverse. Neither should be trusted to sign anything off.
The citation gate
No field exists without a verified quote.
Review it beside the source passage
Confirm, edit, reclassify or reject each field.
“…determined in accordance with GAAP as in effect on December 31, 2018…”
What the export carries
One document an auditor can check line by line.
The specification
Structured, typed, and every row cited.
Built to survive an audit.
What holds up when someone asks where a number came from.
Verbatim quotes only
The model never paraphrases and never computes.
Unverifiable quotes dropped
A missing field, never a confident figure pointing nowhere.
Byte identical re-runs
Two runs over the same corpus produce the same output.
Runs on your infrastructure
Under your own model provider account, or fully local.
Full approval trail
Who reviewed each field, when, against which document hash.
LMA and US-style
Direct lending, mezzanine and special situations agreements.
Findings
What it found in the Inspired Education and Luxfer agreements.
Two real credit agreements, both filed publicly: a 2021 senior facilities agreement for Inspired Education Holdings and a 2011 credit agreement for Luxfer Holdings PLC (NYSE: LXFR). None of this came from a summary. Each finding is anchored to a quoted passage you can pull and check yourself.
A second, tighter leverage test hidden outside the schedule.
Clause 28.1 carries a 3.75:1 incurrence test sitting outside the main covenant schedule, which only steps down from 6.25:1 to 5.50:1. The binding constraint was never in the covenant table.
Frozen GAAP, in four separate definitions.
Lease treatment is pinned to “GAAP as in effect on December 31, 2018.” Testing today's accounts under today's accounting standards produces a different number than the agreement actually requires.
No cap on cash netting.
In the “Total Net Debt” definition, cash is deducted with no ceiling, unlike most agreements which cap this. Material if a borrower nets an unusually large cash balance.
A compliance certificate citing statements nobody delivers.
The certificate is defined against quarterly statements that appear nowhere in the actual reporting schedule. A genuine drafting gap, surfaced only by cross-reading two separate sections against each other.
Request access
Read the agreement. Check the maths. Show the receipts.
Onboarding starts with one of your executed agreements. You get the specification back with every field cited, and you decide whether it holds up.
-
01
You send one executed agreement
A PDF is enough. No data room, no integration.
-
02
We return the cited specification
Every field with its quote, clause and page.
-
03
You check it against the document
No cost, no commitment, and the cited specification is yours to keep either way.
Documents stay yours. Extraction can run entirely on your own infrastructure.